The AI Snake Oil article highlights a growing tension between those who see AI as a unique threat requiring extraordinary government action and those who advocate for more measured, resilience-focused approaches. While the argument for precautionary measures is compelling, it risks creating a regulatory environment that could hinder innovation and impose undue burdens on companies. The challenge lies in distinguishing between genuine risks and speculative fears, ensuring that any intervention is both effective and proportionate. As the debate continues, the focus should remain on fostering resilience without stifling the potential benefits of AI.